Monday, September 29, 2014

Rahm Emanuel

Rahm Emanuel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAkePgf8hkA
Rahm Emanuel qualifications were he studied ballet in college.
Rahm Emanuel was called the “bag man” for the Clinton administration.
From there he got two jobs.  One was he got on the board of Freddy Mac the largest home loan mortgage corporation in the world getting paid $250,000/year. He also got a job with Wasserman Perella where he makes 16 million in less than two years in addition to his Freddy pay.  This is during the time when they (Freddy) were “cooking the books” and caused the financial meltdown.  He made the 16 Mil basically on one large deal ‘advising(?)’ SBC.
The ‘guy*’ that helped make this deal; company, took a loss.  They (SBC) had to sell because they were buying another phone company called Ameri Tec and they had to sell a Security company company called Security Link(?).  A billion to bil & ½ dollar investment.  They sold it to an investment group run by Emanuel for about 500 mil.  6 months later he/they later sold it for a billion dollars.  Whiteacre was the chairman of SBC at the time.
Edward Whiteacre was later appointed (This is under the Obama administration) chairman of GM where upon he announced he knew nothing about making cars.
The person ‘pulling the strings’ in the Obama campaign was a person named Bill Daley* One of his closest friends/enemies had been Jim Johnson who was the chairman of Fannie Mae and his qualifications for being chairman of the largest mortgage company in the world was he had been Walter Mondale’s campaign manager.



SBC (formerly Southern Bell Co.) which grew into the “new” AT&T

[*Edward Whiteacre became chairman of the board and chief executive officer. In 1995, Southwestern Bell Corporation changed its name to SBC.  Whitacre led SBC through a series of mergers and acquisitions in building the largest provider of both local long distance telephone services and wireless service (through its Cingular division) in the United States. These acquisitions included Pacific Telesis (1997), SNET (1998), Comcast Cellular (1999), Ameritech (1999) and AT&T (2005), from which the post-merger company took its name, as well as the 2006 acquisition of Bell South.]

*Bill Daley, brother of Richard Daily, previous mayor of Chicago.

Rahm Emanuel       Now Mayor of Chicago http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/rahm-emanuel-leading-exodus-of-obama-aides-from-white-house-2089118.html

Jim Johnson  key role in the Obama campaign.

Glenn Beck Exposes Rahm Emanuel's Root and Corruption in the Obama's Administration

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAkePgf8hkA

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 02, 2014

Islam, Not a religion but a Political Agenda

"The God of the Bible is not the same god as the god of Islam." To explain this statement it should be known that in the passing of time it has become wildly accepted that the word Allah is just the Arabic word for God. This started when truth compromising Bible "translators" substituted the word Allah where the word God should have been used in the Arabic translation of the Bible. Furthermore, in the glossary in the book ASSASSINS! by Dr. Hsha Lung defines Allah as the "Pre-Islamic Lunar god: god of Islam." Likewise, the book INSIDE ISLAM by Reza F. Safa on pages 22,23 reads "In pre-Islamic times" Allah-worship and Baal-worship involved the worship of the sun, the moon and the stars. which defines them as astral religions. [Astral religions are condemned in the Bible: Second Kings 21:3,5. 23:5. Chronicles 33:5.]
The crescent moon, which was the symbol of moon worship is also the symbol of Islam. "In short, the god of Islam is not the God of the Bible."

_______________________ SCARY FACTS About ISLAM -Dr. Peter Hammond. Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
The commentary below highlights a recent fatwa issued by a top Saudi cleric regarding child brides and sex with female children.
Note this statement from the fatwa, regarding how old girls should be before marriage. Dr. Salih bin Fawzan asserts that “…the only criterion is that they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of men.”
For those who claim this can’t be happening in America, we have seen reports of Muslim men immigrating to Europe, the UK, and to the United States, and identifying their child brides as relatives, such as daughters, in order to avoid scrutiny from Western laws that prohibit pedophilia.
We have no doubt this is happening here. Just one more example of how sharia law is penetrating and threatening America.

__________________________________ Rationalizing Pedophilia in Islam by Raymond Ibrahim Jihad Watch July 29, 2011 http://www.raymondibrahim.com/10011/rationalizing-pedophilia-in-islam
Earlier this month we saw—or rather, were once again reminded—that Islam permits pedophilia in the guise of "marriage": Top Saudi cleric, Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, issued a fatwa asserting that there is no minimum age for girls to marry, "even if they are in the cradle," and that the only criterion is that "they are capable of being placed beneath and bearing the weight of the men."
Admirable patience to childish antics While this practice speaks for itself, it is interesting to witness the great lengths some Muslims go to justify or rationalize it—or even to turn it into a source of pride.
Consider, for example, this Muslim cleric discussing Muhammad's marriage to the child Aisha when she was nine. Far from blushing for shame, the cleric actually uses this anecdote to boast of the prophet's "patience" and "magnanimity." Translation of relevant excerpt follows:
The story of the prophet's marriage to Aisha reveals to us aspects like the prophet's conduct with Aisha, and more importantly the aspect regarding the relationship between the husband and wife, to show how one should treat his wife, just as the prophet did with Aisha.
We know that Asia's mother went to take her down from the swing that she was playing on to fix her hair and prepare her for the prophet so he could enter her [have sex with her]—and she did that all on the same day.
Aisha's own account in Sahih Bukhari is telling enough: she talks about how her mother hurriedly prepared her and then "handed" her over to Muhammad, and how "nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah's Apostle to me in the forenoon."
The cleric continues:
So you see, she was playing with her fellow playmates even though her day of consummation was that very same day—and all that they did was to fix her up for the prophet so he could have sex with her.
Now what do we see when the prophet married Aisha? Did he go to her and say "Okay that's it, you're married, you're now a grown up, you're supposed to be mature, you need to do this and that; you need to forget about your toys and your little friends; you are now a wife of a man, you have to see to my needs" and that's it? No. The prophet allowed her to continue playing with her toy dolls—indeed, the prophet even sometimes gave her such things to play with. [This hadith has more details, including how Aisha's little girl friends would "hide themselves" whenever the prophet came to her until he called them out.]
It should be noted that the cleric recounted the above with much awe and amazement—as if to say, "Look how indulgent and open-minded our prophet was!"
In fact, such was the cleric's whole point: to show that Islam, according to the example of Muhammad, expects older Muslim husbands to be patient with their younger wives: "The older husband should not expect the younger wife to be at his level of maturity; rather, he should go down to her level, for he is capable, whereas she is not."
As "gentlemanly" as this ostensibly sounds, it is yet another example of how Muslim scholars deal with Muhammad's lifestyle: because they cannot condemn or ignore his practices, they inevitably go to great lengths to rationalize or justify them—to find the good in every situation their prophet was involved in, while being oblivious to all the bad.
Thus here we have a cleric straining to finding a positive aspect to Muhammad's pedophilia—that he was patient and indulgent of his child-bride—while ignoring the heart of it: that the man Islam is built around desired to have sex with a child in the first place.

__________________________________________ "WHY THE PEACEFUL MAJORITY IS IRRELEVANT" This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read. This is an opinion piece that appeared on the web site of Paul Marek, who wrote it in March 2007 under the title of "Why the Peaceful Majority is Irrelevant."

A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.  'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.
And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points:
* Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.
* Peace-loving Muslims are becoming our enemy when they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
* Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts--the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, think about it, and urge others to think about it too - before it's too late.

Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too, while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?) The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in. And we are silent.......
"I am Afraid that God has sent these men to Lay Waste the World" ~Patriarch Cyrus of Alexandria, while negotiating the surrender of Alexandria to the Muslims, 640 AD.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________ THE UNBELIEVER’S HANDY GUIDE to understanding why you are NOT an ‘Islamophobe’ if you hate Islam... Make enough copies to hand out to all your fellow unbelievers (non-Muslims) as well as to Muslims who try to sell you on the ‘Religion of Peace’ crap. It’s much easier than arguing until you are blue in the face.

Newbernsj (h/t winterspirit) Islamic scholars agree that Sharia (Islamic law) embraces the law, the state, religion and politics. In fact, Islam is not a religion in any Western sense of the word. It is a complete ideological system. Islam has military, political, legal, economic, social, and religious components. Islam primarily is a political and military doctrine, dedicated to world conquest that wears the cloak of religion. The religious cloak is the cover and the Trojan horse it uses to infiltrate the cultures, nations and civilizations it seeks to destroy and replace with Islamic totalitarianism. Scholar and former Muslim Ibn Warraq says, “Islam itself is a fascist ideology. Islamic fundamentalism is a totalitarian construct derived by Muslim jurists from the fundamental and defining texts of Islam [Qur’an, ahadith, Sira].” Like Marxism and Nazism, Islam is a brutal, oppressive totalitarian ideology that is completely incompatible with democracy, individual liberty, and individualism. Murder is a core Islamic “value.” Islam commands Muslims to kill non-Muslims. It is their religious duty. Surah 9:5, 9:29, and other Qur’anic verses command Muslims to, “Fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them…” More than 100 times the Qur’an calls Muslims to jihad until the supremacy of Islam over the entire world is complete. Islam is a system that institutionalizes war, conquest, imperialism and subjugation as its normative behaviors. In his 1955 book “War and Peace in the Law of Islam,” internationally renowned Iraqi scholar of Sharia, Majid Khadduri explained that, “the Islamic state … sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning ideology over the entire world. The jihad was therefore employed as an instrument for both the universalization of religion and the establishment of an imperial world state.” Hatred is a core Islamic “value.” Hatred is built into Islam. Former Muslim Walid Shoebat says, “Hatred of Jews was my education, what I was taught each day by teachers and parents and the entire community. I knew nothing else.” The Qur’an says Allah hates non-Muslims and sees them as worse than animals. He compares non-Muslims with dogs, pigs, apes. (Q8:55, Q25:44, Q7:176). Muslims and non-Muslims can never be equal (Q39:9; also Q6:50, 28:61, 32:19, 35:19-22, 38:28, 40:58, 45:21, 59:20, 67:22, 68:35). Muslims are the “best of peoples” (Q3:110); Unbelievers are the “vilest of creatures” (98:6). The Pagans are unclean (Q9:28). Housed on the Hudson Institute website, The Center for Religious Freedom produced a report published in 2005 entitled, “Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques.” Here are a few quotes from the Saudi material: “Be dissociated from the infidels, hate them for their religion, do not admire them, and always oppose them in every way according to Islamic law. It is a religious obligation for Muslims to hate Christians and Jews. It is a Muslim’s religious duty to cultivate enmity between oneself and unbelievers.” TQIYYA ( lying and deceit) is a core Islamic “value”:
* Muhammad said, “War is deceit.” Like other totalitarian ideologies, lies and deceit are common tools.
* “Lying and deceit are a part of the Islamic mind-set.” (Former Muslim, former Al-Azhar University professor, Dr Mark Gabriel)
* “Muslims have every right to lie and to deceive their adversaries, and a promise made to a non-Muslim can be broken whenever necessary.” (Amir Taheri)
* “It is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible.” (al-Ghazali, 1058-1111)
According to the authoritative Arabic text, Al-Taqiyya Fi Al-Islam:
* “Taqiyya [deception] is of fundamental importance in Islam.
* Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it.
* We can go so far as to say that the practice of taqiyya is mainstream in Islam.
* Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics, especially in the modern era.”
There are other forms of Muslim deceit, such as tawriya (creative lying) and different meanings for the same words. In Islam, “freedom” means perfect submission to Allah and Sharia. Peace means no opposition, a society under Sharia. Same with “terrorism”; they call it “resistance”. Islamic “resistance” includes mass-murder attacks against people Since the sacred goal of jihad is to make Islam supreme in this world, every lie told to achieve that goal is not only permitted, but sanctified.

Obviously it is good for Islam that the infidel should be kept ignorant of their true intentions, which leads us to the subject at hand. Muslims are very shrewd when it comes to giving gullible infidels a sanitized, revisionist version of Islam, which has nothing to do with reality. Islam and its apologists have been very successful in placing blatantly false materials before the American public. Our media is filled with Islamic apologists who regularly mislead us. PBS has broadcast numerous “documentaries” filled with falsehoods that deceive viewers into thinking Islam is not violent. PBS is a shill for Islam. Leftists and Islam’s apologist dominate our universities. Factual and historical information is blocked. Students are given a false understanding of Islam and its intentions. Books about Islam placed by Muslims in our schools and colleges do not address the aforementioned realities of Islam. Nor do they include the truth concerning Islam’s view of human rights (rejected), freedom of speech (not tolerated), religious freedom (not tolerated), oppression of women (including female genital mutilation), the plight of children (e.g., child marriages – a euphemism for child rape), slavery and slave holding (still prevalent in Islam), or Islam being totally incompatible with, and hostile to democracy.

 Dr. Thomas Sowell did the research and found that Islam has enslaved 25 million black Africans from the seventh century until the present day. Islam’s enslavement of Africans continues today. Just because these materials are free doesn’t mean we should accept them. The Nazis would have been glad to place their propaganda in our schools for free to brainwash our youth. Hatred, deception, war, and oppression are central to Islam. Islam has been at war with the world for 1,400 years, and deceit is one of its most important weapons against us. Allowing a totalitarian ideology to place its propaganda in our education system is comparable to placing Nazi propaganda in our schools in 1939. It is outrageous and unconscionable.

__________________________________ Muslims view "Islamic" terrorists much like christians view the Westboro Baptist Church.


“Muslims built the very fabric of our nation,” obama.

“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”  Quote from his book, Audacity of Hope   obama

“The future must not belong to those that slander the profit of islam,” obama

obama state department: “ISIS does not operate in the name of any religion”.

Obama has high praise for Muslims, claims they built the foundation of our nation.

“If we are practicing Muslims, we are above the law of the land.”  Mustafa Carroll, Director CAIR, Texas.

Council Of Islamic Ideology: ‘Existence Of Women Is Un-Islamic’.   The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting with the ruling that women are un-Islamic and that their mere existence contradicted Sharia and the will of Allah.

Obama Administration broke law by freeing jihadis for Bergdahl 

Obama Administration Refuses to Equate the Islamic State’s Jihad with Hamas’s Jihad

Hamas ideology in a single tweet: “allah is our goal, the profit is our leader, jihad is our way, and death for allah is our most exalted wish.”

Pakistani woman stoned to death for having a cell phone.

Islamic state to US: “Government and citizens alike!...  We will not stop until we quench our thirst for your blood.
 ***********************

SCARY FACTS About ISLAM

-Dr. Peter Hammond.

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.
 **************************

Islam

How many Christians can tell you how Turkey or Egypt became Islamic? What happened to the Seven Churches of Asia mentioned in Paul's letters? Find a Jew who can tell you the Jewish history of dhimmitude (second class citizens who serve Islam). What European knows that white women were the highest priced slaves in Mecca? Everyone knows how many Jews Hitler killed, but find an unbeliever who can tell you how many died in jihad over the last 1400 years...

Mohammed killed every single intellectual or artist who opposed him. It was fear that drove the vast majority of the media not to reprint the Mohammed cartoons, not some imagined sensitivity. All of our politics and ethics are based upon a unitary ethic that is best formulated in the Golden Rule: Treat others as you would be treated... The term "human being" has no meaning inside of Islam. There is no such thing as humanity, only the duality of the believer and unbeliever. Look at the ethical statements found in the Hadith. A Muslim should not lie, cheat, kill or steal from other Muslims. But a Muslim may lie, deceive or kill an unbeliever if it advances Islam... The unbeliever can be treated nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his cattle well. So Islam can be "nice", but in no case is the unbeliever a "brother" or a friend. In fact, there are some 14 verses of the Koran that are emphatic - a Muslim is never a friend to the unbeliever. A Muslim may be "friendly," but he is never an actual friend...

In short, Islamic politics, ethics and logic cannot be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate, it dominates. There is never any "getting along" with Islam. Its demands never cease and the demands must be met on Islam's terms: submission. The last reason for our aversion to the history of political Islam is our shame. Islam put over a million Europeans into slavery. Since Muslims can't be enslaved, it was a white Christian who was the Turkish sultan's sex slave. These are things that we do not want to face. Jews don't want to acknowledge the history of political Islam, because they were dhimmis, second class citizens or semi - slaves, just like the Christians. Jews like to recall how they were advisors and physicians to powerful Muslims, but no matter what the Jew did or what position he held, he was still a dhimmi. There is no compromise between being equal and being a dhimmi. Why should a Hindu want to recall the shame of slavery and the destruction of their temples and cities? After Hindu craftsmen built the Taj Mahal, the Muslim ruler had their right hands cut off so that they could not build anything as beautiful for anyone else. The practice of suttee, the widow throwing herself on the husband's funeral pyre, came about as a response to the rape and brutality of the Islamic jihad as it sweep over ancient Hindustan. Blacks don't want to face the fact that it was a Muslim who rounded up their ancestors in Africa to wholesale to the white slave trader. The Arab is the true master of the African. Blacks can't accept the common bond they share with whites: that both Europeans and Africans were slaves under Islam. Blacks like to imagine Islam is their counterweight to white power, not that Islam has ruled them for 1400 years...

About 67% of the Koran written in Mecca is about the unbelievers, or politics. Of the Koran of Medina, 51% is devoted to the unbelievers. About 20% of Bukhari's Hadith is about jihad and politics. Religion is the smallest part of Islamic foundational texts... Political Islam's most famous duality is the division of the world into believers, dar al Islam, and unbelievers, dar al harb. The largest part of the Trilogy relates to treatment of the unbelievers, kafirs. Even Hell is political. There are 146 references to Hell in the Koran. Only 6% of those in Hell are there for moral failings-murder, theft, etc. The other 94% of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Mohammed, a political crime. Hence, Islamic Hell is a political prison for those who speak against Islam. Mohammed preached his religion for 13 years and garnered only 150 followers. But when he turned to politics and war, in 10 years time he became the first ruler of Arabia by averaging an event of violence every 7 weeks for 9 years. His success did not come as a religious leader, but as a political leader... The history of political Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest. Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was annihilated and 80 million Hindus killed. The first Western Buddhists were the Greeks descended from Alexander the Great's army in what is now Afghanistan. Jihad destroyed all of Buddhism along the silk route. About 10 million Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the practical result of pacifism. Zoarasterianism was eliminated from Persia. The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam. In Africa over 120 million Christians and animists have died over the last 1400 years of jihad. Approximately 270 million nonbelievers died over the last 1400 years for the glory of political Islam. These are the Tears of Jihad which are not taught in any school...

Christians believe that "love conquers all." Well, love does not conquer Islam. Christians have a difficult time seeing Islam as a political doctrine, not a religion. The sectarian nature of Christian thought means that the average non-Orthodox Christian has no knowledge or sympathy about the Orthodox Christian's suffering. Jews have a theology that posits a unique relationship between Jews and the creator-god of the universe. But Islam sees the Jews as apes who corrupted the Old Testament. Jews see no connection between Islam's political doctrine and Israel. Black intellectuals have based their ideas on the slave/victim status and how wrong it was for white Christians to make them slaves. Islam has never acknowledged any of the pain and suffering it has caused in Africa with its 1400-year-old slave trade. But blacks make no attempt to get an apology from Muslims and are silent in the presence of Islam. Why? Is it because Arabs are their masters? Multiculturalism is bankrupt against Islam's demand for every civilization to submit. The culture of tolerance collapses in the face of the sacred intolerance of dualistic ethics. Intellectuals respond by ignoring the failure... The victims deny that the abuse took place: Our media never reports the majority of jihad around the world. Our intellectuals don't talk about how all of the violence is connected to a political doctrine... The victims find ways to blame themselves: We are to blame for the attacks on September 11, 2001. If we try harder Muslims will act nicer. We have to accommodate their needs. The victim is humiliated: White people will not talk about how their ancestors were enslaved by Islam. No one wants to claim the victims of jihad. Why won't we claim the suffering of our ancestors? Why don't we cry about the loss of cultures and peoples? We are too ashamed to care. The victim feels helpless: "What are we going to do?" "We can't kill 1.3 billion people." No one has any understanding or optimism. No one has an idea of what to try. The only plan is to "be nicer." The victim turns the anger inward: What is the most divisive issue in today's politics? Iraq. And what is Iraq really about? Political Islam. The Web has a video about how the CIA and Bush planned and executed September 11. Cultural self-loathing is the watchword of our intellectuals and artists. We hate ourselves because we are mentally molested and abused. Our intellectuals and artists have responded to the abuse of jihad just as a sexually abused child or a rape victim would respond. We are quite intellectually ill and are failing at our job of clear thinking. We can't look at our denial...

Political Islam has annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to. The total time for annihilation takes centuries, but once Islam is ascendant it never fails. The host culture disappears and becomes extinct. We must learn the doctrine of political Islam to survive. The doctrine is very clear that all forms of force and persuasion may and must be used to conquer us. Islam is a self- declared enemy of all unbelievers... Islam declares that we are the enemies of Allah. If we do not learn the political doctrine of Islam we will end up just like the first victims of Islam - the tolerant, polytheist Arabs of Saudi Arabia who became the Wahabbis (a very strict branch of Islam) of today, the most intolerant culture on the face of the earth.


************************

 The quam  (koran)

In the quam as I like to call it, it says 126 times: "convert or die."
Now, it doesn't say that word for word and such is the argument the Muzzies say but you interpret this for me.  I would like to point out that the quam has been interpreted into English by the Muzzies themselves (including several very sanitized versions) this is from the one usually referred to as most accurate from UCLA.  I believe and this is what some of the passages say:

“Some ye slew and ye made captive some.  And he caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth and land ye have not trodden. . . “ Koran 33:26-27

"I shall terrorize the infidels, so wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and his Apostle" (Koran 8:12)

"The infidels should not think that they can get away from us.  Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.  They are your enemy and Allah’s enemy."  Koran 8:59

"Your lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I am with you.  Give firmness to the Believers.  I will terrorize the unbelievers.  Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them.  Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes."  Koran 8:12

So, how would you interpret that?  Love and kisses?  Tolerance?  Multiculturalism?

It says much worse in the Hadith or eHadith over 400 times. 

Now the Muzzies will argue that this is referring to "back then" and not present day.  That would be like saying passages in the bible refer to "back than" and do not apply now.  But beyond that, here is what their leaders have to say:

“We know of no absolute values besides total submission of the will of the almighty.  People say: “Don’t lie!”  But the principle is different when we serve the will of Allah.  He taught man to lie so that we can save ourselves at moments of difficulty and confuse our enemies.  Should we remain truthful at the cost of defeat and danger to the Faith?  We say not.  People say: “Don’t Kill!”  But the Almighty himself taught us how to kill.  Without such a skill man would have been wiped out long ago by the beasts.  So shall we not kill when it is necessary for the triumph of the Faith?...  Deceit, trickery, conspiracy, cheating, stealing and killing are nothing but means.  On their own they are neither good or bad, isolated from the intentions that motivated it.”
Ayatollah Khomeini

Remember Ayatollah?  Jimmy Carter was a big fan of the ayatollah.


George Bush calls Islam a religion of peace and has held Iftar dinners at the White house to tell imams how their religion has been hijacked by radicals.  The FBI even invites CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, when some of its leaders have been convicted on terrorism-related charges to one of the country's largest airports, Chicago's O'Hare, and gives them a behind-the-scene tour to demonstrate how security is conducted.  CAIR is even giving sensitivity training to our FBI and government workers.  Chip

Kansas city International Airport installed Muslim foot-washing benches so Muslim cab drivers can wash their feet before prayers.  I (Brigitte) lived in the Middle East for the first twenty four years of my life and never once did I see a foot-washing station in any public place including airports, universities, public buildings, or hospitals.  Chip

Every crack 'they' can get a foothold every cranny they can exploit, the Muslims are working their way into our lives and eventually their goal is [for us to] become Muslem or die.

“The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a “civilization-Jihadist” process with all that word means.  The Ikhwan (you and me) must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” their miserable house by their hands and the hands of believers."

Another document found in the home of a terrorist suspect in 1991 illiterates the North American plan for the 'Project" by "Ikhwan" ("Brothers"), the Muslim Brotherhood's American Branch.  This 18 page document is a comprehensive plan that charts the ground work for the establishment of an Islamic government in North America and the implementation of Sharia law.
A small part of the document says: – grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging' their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers --

Every little change they can make no matter how minuscule is a win for their side.  Remember it is a 100 year plan..  Now There are  "women only" gym hours at Harvard University (to comply with the Muslim requests).  An Iman gave opening prayer in des Moines, Iowa legislative session where he prayed, (allah) "give us victory over those who do not believe."  Muslim taxi drivers won't pick up somebody carrying alcohol or someone with a seeing-eye-dog (dogs are dirty).  The first Islamic Public School in New York opened in 2007 funded by tax dollars.  Colleges are making 'prayer' rooms available for Muslim use only.   Chip chip chip chip.

OK, there are probably some good Muzzies out there.  There were good Germans and Japanese in 1942 but we wouldn't have won that war if we had all these "politically correct" assholes in charge.
Roosevelt didn't ask Hitler to lunch or Tojo to give the breakfast prayer like barry (AKA Obama) has done with the Muzzies.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,